Friday, February 29, 2008
relation to the past.
Tonight I left class feeling good, high, better than when I arrived. Not to say I felt bad or ill when class began, but more that it is impossible not to feel better after coming and going. We sit around this island of a table, the professor at one end and myself at the other, and talk about Kristeva and Kafka. Next week more of Rilke and Baudelaire. These are all some of my favorite minds. I can’t help but prefer the hours I sit engaged in the exchange of ideas, rather than the hours I feel forced to talk, listen or occasionally share—out of pure necessity—reflected stories on people and things. No one talks in class, and I see how the silence feels disturbing to the professor—how the speechlessness and vocal inactivity is distracting and distressing. I talk, bring handouts, try and give something without being too much of a character; the one male in the class had a piece of writing passed out, anonymously, to the class (but I knew it was his, despite other female’s perception that “males don’t write romantically or expose feelings”). Still the class said very little. I couldn’t help but copy sentences from his work, quoting them in my new book of materials. Male writers… ahhh… where do the words come from? and yet, how intrigued and struck I am by the men who materialize their thoughts. Home, and I find more Blanchot to buy, come across more and more photography portfolios (more and more work that excites me—photography makes me see the world differently, literature helps me see the world). Made up a big pot of soup, which really was “thick as fog” and as it cooked read Durrell’s Balthazar (Justine was exquisite—genius, so on to his next). Walked through the park to a friend’s apartment. The night was already much colder, but this winter the city keeps you conditioned and whatever its temperament may be I never seem to mind, dispute or fight it. Though as I thought all this, a man in passing said, “Nothing changes but the weather.” Ah, the routine of life, we all experience it to varying degrees. Perhaps, routines are the one thing we can rely on, if it is not the weather? Before the curtains fully draped their secret insides, the windows exposed pairs sharing wine—red cheeks caressed with emotion. This always makes me happy to see. The intimacy of red wine is a weakness of mine, regardless. I listened to a pizza boy continue on his delivery with a flat—cursing his luck. Heard some guys at a bar talking about how he wasn’t his father, unfortunately, but at least he looked damn good. Climbed the stairs of repetition and fell back on the couch, greeted by the usual ashtray of couple’s cigarettes and a freshly poured glass (and soon later, glasses) of Baileys, which in its coolness would seemingly make me feel warm. Listened to stories of love, the Honeymoon phase (which can last the entire relationship, if you do as I did ☺ treat dinners as continuous dates which is a constant reason to celebrate…and all the other secrets), work disasters and on and on. I felt like I was talking through glossy eyes and a perpetually merging smile. Leaving, I couldn’t help but take notice of how storytelling is really just a practice in enlarging ideas (usually idealized ideas) and expounding beyond the natural and intended. I mean, really, how can any of us really trust what we “know” or “say we know” of the actions and truisms of others? I shouldn’t be the one that tries and decides what another feels or felt. That is up to them. But, I guess, imaginations and assumptions lead us elsewhere and back into the minds of others. Also all the talk drove home how I miss intimacy—not physicality, but intimacy. And though hearing about relationships and seeing partners here, there and sometimes what feels like everywhere may always appear special, I know that I am lucky to have experienced what I have—to know those feelings and have an archive of those memories, but still I see how hard I judge everything else in comparison. I give fewer things a chance. And I certainly don’t believe in excuses, which can be translated as, I don’t believe in wasting time or energy. I think back through my writings, take notice how relationships, love and sex never surface on paper. My writing seems uninterested in those topics. My journals portray zero engagements. Yet, I have multiple stories that have all been so different. Stories that surprise me, stories that all have lent themselves to shaping my idea of romance, physicality, sensuality and all that isn’t that. I realize how much I have “forgotten”—that seemed to slip away into oblivion, but still exists buried beneath all the more recent or more glorified layers of engagement. It is interesting how past relations have revealed themselves in my work in a very influential and yet, masked way. As if I have worked from the essence of the individual or the questions he inspired rather than, using our storyline/plot. This is a style I discussed further with my professor this week—which I want to flesh out in writing further. Recently in talking to an old loooove and perhaps forever, infatuation, he spoke to me about my writing (I should admit, this took my breath and won’t be something I forget) and I told him how often I want to write of our times. A time where it wasn’t necessarily myself that felt differently, but the space around me that felt reborn, newly discovered and uninhabited. I felt like a stranger to the city—a city I have known and lived in all my life, but which in being there with him, I noticed I had never been and never lived inside of. I spoke sincerely of my interest in reviving those moments of memory in writing. Almost as a way of giving the enchantment a tone of realism. However, I think sometimes one needs distance from the experience—one needs maturity, perhaps to reason and not be as effected in all the wrong places. I refrain from admitting… but it is always when I am outside of the time, that I am most inside of it. Is it then that my imagination seems most real? There is no saying. But I think I am ready, or at least getting closer, to developing the character analyses, finding where the story really lies, beginning the novel and devoting myself at length to crystallizing my past and celebrating the characters that have helped develop my writing eye.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I like your writing style, I feel you are talented, and that if we ever met in person, we'd have good conversations. I too love and have experience with the arts and literature, and I've also had a little journey with my body and self-image, so we have a few things in common.
Some say that science and writing are opposites, however I believe there is a science to writing. Ideas are abstracted, magnified, or projected to fit a language, or a cause. As with light waves and sound, ideas can magnify, shrink, and expand at certain wavelengths. Aspects of these waves and patterns are dependent not only upon its source or destination, but upon the atmosphere it travels through.
Hence, sometimes the written word "strikes a chord" with some people; and with some not. If the writer and the reader are on the same "wavelength," if mental/emotional/physical obstacles don't get in the way, there is a commonality, a continuation of the circuit, of the idea. It can move like electricity and defy gravity, but a connection must be formed first.
The idea then changes form: into physical action, or emotions, or nerve impulses that powers new thought processes, or even potential energy that will be stored into memory cells and used later in combination with other ideas to create new ideas, or new actions and feelings in a person or in a group of people.
It's an amazing phenomenon. Therefore I find it painful to hear how some people say art, literature, and writing are "unproductive" relics of the past, and are "useless" to today's technological and supply & demand-based society. As I've stated in my past journal entries, the written word has caused countless revolutions throughout history, and it will continue to do.
I am comforted to hear you treasure your memories, both good and bad. On an individual scale, one could say our ideas are based on memories. We need memories to understand or at least explore relationships between words, objects, and people. We attach feelings to our memories, and these combined are not only expressed through our writing and art, but our actions. Our phobias, our desires, our good and bad habits, whether we are aware of it or not. Most aspects of our behavior can be traced back to a certain memory.
Writers learn to harness their knowledge of everything they know both internally and externally to communcate things effectively. A novel or any expressed work is an inward journey of the writer's mind. Most novelists and writers acquire this self-awareness, then transform what they see inside themselves into something external, into a written work, that gives the illusion of an omniscient awareness of others, of characters, of the world inside their novel. As if they turned themselves inside out.
We crave what "make sense" of the world, and that is one thing novels have that reality doesn't. One can spend his or her whole life trying to "make sense" of what he/she sees, knows, and understands,--when in actuality, the human mind could not possibly know "everything" or "how the world works." As you mentioned earlier, we don't even know how another person "works."
One can only hope to learn not to get so caught up with details or ideals sometimes, to find charm and positivity in uncertainness, beauty in what's dark, painful, and imperfect--let alone acceptance of it all--and to enjoy and appreciate the good moments for as long as they last. To use the memories to one's benefit and to color one's life.
One must learn to appreciate the arts, such as the written word, and what the individual is trying to express about him/herself. The uniqueness of his/her ideas, and how they came to form. The actions of millions of people affect our own actions, every single moment--and vice versa.
We would not be where we are today if it weren't for the people around us. We are products of our environment, just as our environment is a product of us. It's not a linear relationship, it's more like a fluid relationship; sometimes it's even balanced.
It makes sense to have this human desire to create, destroy, and recreate art--as art is generally a reflection of what we see around us, and what is around us is almost always changing in ways that never cease to amaze us. Everything that is constructed will eventually be deconstructed.
If anything is certain, besides uncertainness, it is that we human beings have a need to express ourselves to one another, in some form, in some way. We are meant to fight the impermanence around us, to build things that will last, to make an imprint on as many people as we can, on future generations, to send messages to people we know we will never meet. It is crucial to our survival, it is important in our identity, some say this separates us from other creatures on earth.
True, we can only take and ingest information when we are ready to hear it. However, in this modern society where we live by the clock, we also seem to be losing our abilities to listen to each other, to fit time to truly absorb and question information in our fast-paced, day-to-day schedule. Stopping to appreciate things is regarded as "idle" and "recreation," rather as something necessary.
That is why art is "art"; it's beyond ordinary, it's a technique many aren't aware or even conscious of. Art is disguised as an "accident," or a "snapshot of reality," even though it is in actuality something more planned and abstract.
The illusion of reality in a work of art (whether it be the written word, a painting or a photograph) creates the avenues, the atmosphere, on which ideas and emotions of the artist and the beholder can play on, converge, and be absorbed.
Good luck to both of us on our journeys :)
-sheila, aka "makimonster" on LJ
Post a Comment